Strengthen your paper and improve its chances of acceptance.
Find weaknesses, strengthen your argument, and prepare your manuscript before submission.
Add a PDF, DOCX, or LaTeX file. ResearchScore extracts the paper’s structure and prepares its sections, figures, tables, and references for review.
Each reviewer evaluates the methodology, originality, citations, logic, and writing. They then challenge one another’s findings before reaching a final verdict.
See which passages need work, why they were flagged, and what to change. Ask additional questions and explore suitable journals before you submit.
View Sample ReportEach reviewer evaluates methodology, originality, citations, logic, and writing before challenging the others' findings.
Independent assessment
Major Revision
5.4/10
Strongest concern
The main comparison changes two variables, so the source of the reported gain is unclear.
See how three independent models challenge one another's findings before reaching a final verdict.
AI REVIEW TEAM
Structured Debate with 3 Reviewers
Condensed sample transcript. Reviews stream their analysis and debate in real time.
Ask the reviewers to explain their reasoning, then turn the final score into a shortlist of journals that fit your paper.
Chat with a reviewer
Your review stays in context
The contribution is useful, but Section 2 does not clearly separate it from the two closest baselines. Add a direct comparison of the objective function and explain what your formulation makes possible that theirs does not.
Example matches for an energy systems paper, ranked by fit.
Strong scope fit for applied energy-system optimization with a clear real-world contribution.
Structured AI feedback for research papers, from your first manuscript draft to your next submission.
Check your methods, supporting evidence, and citations before submitting to a journal.
Assess how clearly your paper explains its contribution and supports its findings before the deadline.
Get an independent assessment of your draft and identify what to improve next.
Check your updated paper for remaining weaknesses, unclear claims, and inconsistencies.
Give co-authors structured feedback to discuss, prioritize, and turn into a revision plan.
ResearchScore keeps each paper inside its owner's account boundary, limits how it is processed, and gives deletion a defined end.
Every paper, review, reviewer chat, and journal request requires authentication and an ownership check. Other users cannot retrieve or probe for the record.
Model policy
ResearchScore does not train AI models on your manuscript.
Immediately
Paper, reviews, and expert chats are removed from live systems.
Within 4 days
Encrypted rolling backups expire and are purged.
A single model guesses. A journal takes months. ResearchScore gives you a structured verdict from multiple reviewers in minutes.
| ResearchScore | Single AI chatbot | Traditional peer review | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent perspectives | 3 AI reviewers | 1 model response | 2+ human reviewers |
| Structured debate and final verdict | |||
| Citation coverage and consistency | |||
| Five-area manuscript assessment | |||
| Available before submission | |||
| Explicit no-training policy | Not applicable | ||
| Typical turnaround | Minutes | Minutes | Weeks or months |
ResearchScore purchases include an itemized invoice that students, faculty, and research teams can submit under their institution's reimbursement process.
Reimbursement eligibility depends on your university or funding organization's policies.
Itemized invoice included
Available for every paid plan
Pay by card as an individual researcher or on behalf of your institution.
Include your institution, department, tax ID, and grant or purchase-order reference.
Access an itemized PDF invoice from your account after payment.
Need a quotation, purchase order, or consolidated billing for a department? Contact our team.
Everything you need to know before your first review.
Join thousands of researchers using ResearchScore to refine their work before submission.
Register Today